The foundation for action
Diagnosis is inextricably linked to vision development as the foundation of a SMART change process. Whether vision or diagnosis should come first is a classic chicken and egg problem. Diagnosing where there is no clear vision is difficult, yet developing a vision that is not based on clear understanding of the current situation is equally problematic. In practice, both need to be done in parallel, and like visioning, diagnosis is something that must continue throughout the change process - and beyond.
While there is no single blueprint for delivering sustainable services, there are a number of elements that need to be in place (see delivering services section). Tools that help guide stakeholders through a consultative process of analysing what's working and what's not are critical for:
- Identifying and prioritising areas for change;
- Aligning thinking and efforts to support collective action;
- Clarifying roles and responsibilities across complex systems of actors for delivering sustainable services.
The requirements for effective diagnosis are very similar to what is required for visioning - and include:
- Strong stakeholders (and particularly government) ownership and leadership: if the (governmental) organisations responsible for service delivery are not involved in developing the framework for data collection and analysis and discussion and presentation of results, they may simply chose to ignore what comes out of the diagnosis - particularly if it runs contrary to officially sanctioned narratives. This is a frequent problem with externally financed diagnostic studies.
- Sector know-how: diagnosis should draw on existing sector knowledge and expertise. A well-managed process of diagnosis should also positively challenge stakeholders to interrogate their own perceptions of success and/or progress.
- Comprehensiveness: there are typically many existing assessments of parts of WASH service delivery: of costs involved, of technologies used or of institutions. But many of the issues in WASH service delivery are interrelated. Emphasis here is on tools that seek to provide a comprehensive diagnosis of the whole system in order to see those linkages.
Tools & guidance
The tools included here are limited to those that allow a comprehensive (sub)-sector diagnosis, and exclude tools that zoom into a specific aspect of service delivery.
The principles framework describes the essential conditions for sustainable service delivery at various institutional levels. The framework allows stakeholder to maintain the bigger picture of systemic change while identifying concrete areas of work, for which detailed strategies and plans can be developed. The framework was used to support change in the rural water subsector in Ghana and Uganda under the Triple-S project.
This Triple-S Working Paper presents the Triple-S Principles Framework and the key concepts behind it. It provides a description of how the...
How to analyse the strengths and weaknesses of a WASH system?
In an increasingly urbanising world, with some 863 million people living in informal urban settlements in 2012 (based on UN estimates), there is a...
This study aimed to get an overview over the income and expenditure flows in the Ugandan rural water and sanitation sector, with a...
The paper seeks to analyse and describe the processes and actions undertaken by IRC and its partners to create large-scale change in Ghana's rural...
This study examined the planning process for delivering sustainable WASH services in Ghana, particularly with respect to the existing and...
Mapping the demand for sanitation, against the capacity of supply chain actors to supply affordable products that meet consumer needs and desires...