Handwashing after contact with excreta is poorly practised globally, despite the likely positive health benefits.
Title | Systematic review : hygiene and health : systematic review of handwashing practices worldwide and update of health effects |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2014 |
Authors | Freeman, MC, Stocks, ME, Cumming, O, Jeandron, A, Higgins, JPT, Wolf, J, Pruss-Ustun, A, Bonjour, S, Hunter, PR, Fewtrell, L, Curtis, V |
Secondary Title | Tropical medicine & international health |
Volume | 19 |
Pagination | 906–916 |
Date Published | 05/2014 |
Publication Language | English |
Keywords | health impact, meta-analysis, soap |
Abstract | Objective To estimate the global prevalence of handwashing with soap and derive a pooled estimate of the effect of hygiene on diarrhoeal diseases, based on a systematic search of the literature. Methods Studies with data on observed rates of handwashing with soap published between 1990 and August 2013 were identified from a systematic search of PubMed, Embase and ISI Web of Knowledge. A separate search was conducted for studies on the effect of hygiene on diarrhoeal disease that included randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised trials with control group, observational studies using matching techniques and observational studies with a control group where the intervention was well defined. The search used Cochrane Library, Global Health, BIOSIS, PubMed, and Embase databases supplemented with reference lists from previously published systematic reviews to identify studies published between 1970 and August 2013. Results were combined using multilevel modelling for handwashing prevalence and meta-regression for risk estimates. Results From the 42 studies reporting handwashing prevalence we estimate that approximately 19% of the world population washes hands with soap after contact with excreta (i.e. use of a sanitation facility or contact with children's excreta). Meta-regression of risk estimates suggests that handwashing reduces the risk of diarrhoeal disease by 40% (risk ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.53–0.68); however, when we included an adjustment for unblinded studies, the effect estimate was reduced to 23% (risk ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.32–1.86). Conclusions Our results show that handwashing after contact with excreta is poorly practised globally, despite the likely positive health benefits. |
Notes | Includes 55 ref. |
DOI | 10.1111/tmi.12339 |