A critical reflection on the use of planning, monitoring, evaluation and learning (PMEL) tools.
| Title | Monitoring civil society advocacy : a guide for the water sector |
| Publication Type | Working Paper |
| Year of Publication | 2020 |
| Authors | Joyce, D, van der Laan, A, Hoitink, C, van Lieshout, R |
| Pagination | 22 p. : 14 fig. |
| Date Published | 12/2020 |
| Publisher | IRC / Watershed |
| Place Published | The Hague, the Netherlands |
| Publication Language | English |
| Keywords | capacity action plans, capacity self-assessments, outcome harvesting, qualitative information systems, theories of change |
| Abstract | This paper documents and critically reflects upon the planning, monitoring, evaluation and learning (PMEL) processes of the Watershed empowering citizens programme. The four primary tools used to monitor progress and learning were: theories of change (ToCs), capacity self-assessments (CSAs) and capacity action plans (CAPs), qualitative information system ladders (QIS) and outcome harvesting. The paper concludes with some key lessons learned and best practices. |
| Notes | Includes 8 ref. |
| URL | https://watershed.nl/media/monitoring-civil-society-advocacy-a-guide-for-the-water-sector/ |
| Citation Key | 87449 |
