Skip to main content
TitleAfrica wide water, sanitation and hygiene technology review
Publication TypeMiscellaneous
Year of Publication2011
AuthorsParker, A, Smith, J, Norman, R, Henriques, C, Muro, M, Carter, R, Casey, V, Danert, K, Olschewski, A, Butterworth, J, Institute of Water and Environment, Cranfield University -Silsoe, GB
Pagination93 p. : 1 box, 9 fig., 1 tab.
Date Published2011-11-01
PublisherCranfield University at Silsoe
Place PublishedCranfield, UK
Keywordsafrica, case studies, technical assistance, technical cooperation, technical development

WASHTech has published a literature review focusing on 14 technologies used in Africa in the water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) sector. For each technology there is a description of the range of literature available on it, a concise description of the technology itself, a description of its application, a selection of interesting case studies, and an explanation as to whether the technology meets technical, financial, social and institutional success criteria. Only two technologies met all four success criteria: hand dug wells and the India Mark II pump, and the latter only with the caveat that there was a functional maintenance system. The least successful technology was the Playpump, which was only institutionally successful, and even that was only after significant pressure was put on governments by non-conventional donors. Jerry cans and the gulper only met one success criteria (technical success); they may meet other success criteria but further research is required. Most technologies were technically successful – the only failures were bio-additives and Playpumps. The other success criteria were met by roughly half of the technologies. Core issues that WASHTech plans to take up further include the appeal of inappropriate technologies like Playpumps and Lifestraws to naive donors, and ways to get government approval for low-cost, locally managed technologies.

NotesWith bibliography p. 42 - 61
Custom 1201, 301



The copyright of the documents on this site remains with the original publishers. The documents may therefore not be redistributed commercially without the permission of the original publishers.

Back to
the top